Why valence is not enough in the study of emotions: behavioural differences between regret and disappointment

Authors

  • Luis Fructuoso Martinez
  • Marcel Zeelenberg
  • John B. Rijsman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v22i2.349

Keywords:

-

Abstract

This paper reflects on the role of emotions on decision-making. The authors stress the limitations of a valence (“positivity” versus “negativity”) based approach. Emotions and their experiential content are synthetically exposed. Research has shown that ever closely related emotions – such as regret and disappointment -, whether anticipated or experienced, have differential influences on the behavior on decision makers. This favours emotion-specific research in decision-making context, i.e., the pragmatic “feeling-is-for-doing” approach. We believe the emotional system is the primary motivational system for goal-directed behavior.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v22i2.349

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

-

How to Cite

Martinez, L. F., Zeelenberg, M., & Rijsman, J. B. (2008). Why valence is not enough in the study of emotions: behavioural differences between regret and disappointment. PSICOLOGIA, 22(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v22i2.349

Issue

Section

Thematic issue