Patriarchal Beliefs Scale: Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version

Autores

  • Eunice Magalhães
  • Inês Chim
  • Patricio Costa
  • Beatriz David
  • João Graça

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1986

Palavras-chave:

Patriarchal beliefs, psychometrics, social dominance, sexism, gender

Resumo

Patriarchal beliefs convey the power discrepancy between men and women in society. The current study examines the psychometric properties for the Patriarchal Beliefs Scale (PBS) in the Portuguese context, including its construct and convergent validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. A sample of 488 adults (66.8% women) with ages ranging from 18 to 77 years old (M = 27.6 years, SD = 11.8) participated in this study. The results confirmed the original three-factorial structure of the PBS (Institutional power of men, Inherent inferiority of women, and Gendered domestic roles), the measurement invariance across gender, as well as convergent validity warranted by the positive and significant correlations between the patriarchal beliefs, social dominance, and sexism. Men significantly outscored women in all these dimensions. The current study provides evidence of the validity and reliability of the PBS in the Portuguese context, enabling further opportunities to implement cross-cultural studies in this field.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abu-Ras, W. (2007). Cultural beliefs and service utilization by battered Arab immigrant women. Violence Against Women, 13(10), 1002-1028. https://doi.10.1177/1077801207306019

Batalha, L., Reynolds, K. J., & Newbigin, C. A. (2011). All else being equal: Are men always higher in social dominance orientation than women?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 796-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.829

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process

Canto, J. M., Vallejo-Martín, M., Perles, F., & San Martín, J. (2020). The influence of ideological variables in the denial of violence against women: The role of sexism and social dominance orientation in the Spanish context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4934. doi:10.3390/ijerph17144934

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Chim, I., Magalhães, E., Graça, J., Antunes, C., & Ferreira, C. (2020). Child sexual abuse myth scale: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 802-820. https://doi.10.1080/10538712.2020.1801934

Comissão para a Cidadania e a Igualdade de Género (2024). Igualdade de Género em Portugal: Boletim Estatístico 2023 [PDF]. https://cld.pt/dl/download/e31838f9-aac0-4b19-ba8e-495e4fc452a1/BE2023.pdf

Crittenden, C. A., & Wright, E. M. (2013). Predicting patriarchy: Using individual and contextual factors to examine patriarchal endorsement in communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(6), 1267-1288. https://doi.10.1177/0886260512468245

Espinoza, G., Hokoda, A., Ulloa, E. C., Ulibarri, M. D., & Castaneda, D. (2012). Gender differences in the relations among patriarchal beliefs, parenting, and teen relationship violence in Mexican adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 21(7), 721-738. https://doi.10.1080/10926771.2012.703289

Fowers, A. F., & Fowers, B. J. (2010). Social dominance and sexual self-schema as moderators of sexist reactions to female subtypes. Sex Roles, 62, 468-480. https://doi.10.1007/s11199-009-9607-7

Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., ... & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763-775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763

Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., Oliveira, A., & Milfont, T. L., (2018). Why are women less likely to support animal exploitation than men? The mediating roles of social dominance orientation and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.007

Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2003). Beliefs about wife beating among Arab men from Israel: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Journal of Family Violence, 18(4), 193-206. https://doi.10.1023/A:1024012229984

Haj‐Yahia, M. M. (2005). Can people's patriarchal ideology predict their beliefs about wife abuse? The case of Jordanian men. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(5), 545-567. https://doi.10.1002/jcop.20068

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1111

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553-573. https://doi.10.1177/1077801208331246

Jahan, S. (2022). Challenges to female college principals and vice principals: Patriarchal gender beliefs in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-17. https://doi.10.1177/17411432221115521

Janjua, M. M., & Kamal, A. (2023). Development and validation of patriarchal beliefs scale in Pakistani culture. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(2), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-II)22

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. In Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. Guilford Press.

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Lishinsk, A. (2022). Package ‘lavaan’.

Magalhães, E., Graça, J., Antunes, C., Ferreira, C., & Pinheiro, M. (2022). Why are men more likely to endorse myths about child sexual abuse than women? Evidence from disposition and situation-based approaches. Child Maltreatment, 27(3), 356-365. https://doi.10.1177/1077559520988353

Magalhães, E., Oliveira, G. K., Leitão, F., Chaves, S., Capela, S., Nogueira, C., & Martins, C. (2007). Adaptação do Inventário de sexismo ambivalente para uma população de estudantes universitários portugueses. Psicologia: Teoria, Investigação e Prática, 12, 41-53.

Matlin, M. W. (2012). The psychology of women (7ª ed.). Australia.

McKinley, C. E., Lilly, J. M., Knipp, H., & Liddell, J. L. (2021). “A Dad Can Get the Money and the Mom Stays at Home”: Patriarchal Gender Role Attitudes, Intimate Partner Violence, Historical Oppression, and Resilience Among Indigenous Peoples. Sex Roles, 85(9), 499-514. https://doi.10.1007/s11199-021-01232-7

Mkhize, G., & Njawala, L. (2016). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity and patriarchal privilege within heterosexual interpersonal relationships. The Oriental Anthropologist, 16(2), 379-397.

of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Ogle, R. S., & Batton, C. (2009). Revisiting patriarchy: Its conceptualization and operationalization in criminology. Critical Criminology, 17(3), 159-182. https://doi.10.1007/s10612-009-9081-0

O'Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men's gender role conflict using the Gender Role Conflict Scale: New research paradigms and clinical implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 358-445. https://doi.10.1177/0011000008317057

Ozaki, R., & Otis, M. D. (2017). Gender equality, patriarchal cultural norms, and perpetration of intimate partner violence: Comparison of male university students in Asian and European cultural contexts. Violence Against Women, 23(9), 1076-1099. https://doi.10.1177/1077801216654575

Perista, H., Cardoso, A., Brázia, A., Abrantes, M., Perista, P., & Quintal, E. (2016). Os usos do tempo de homens e de mulheres em Portugal. Centro de Estudos para a Intervenção Social (CESIS)/Comissão para a Igualdade no Trabalho e no Emprego (CITE). http://cidadaniaemportugal.pt/wp-content/uploads/recursos/cite_os_usos_do_tempo_de_homens_e_de_mulheres_em_portugal.pdf

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

R Development Core Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Revelle, W. R. (2017). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Software

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation models. Journal of

Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043

Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Tripathi, S. (2020). Patriarchal beliefs and perceptions towards women among Indian police officers: A study of Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 22(3), 232-241. https://doi.10.1177/1461355720905612

Weston, R., & Gore Jr, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345

Ymamgulyyeva, A., Kafescioğlu, N., & Harma, M. (2024). Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality. Family Relations, 73(2), 1311-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12881

Yoon, E., Adams, K., Hogge, I., Bruner, J. P., Surya, S., & Bryant, F. B. (2015). Development and validation of the Patriarchal Beliefs Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 264-279. https://doi.10.1037/cou0000056

Yoon, E., Cabirou, L., Bhang, C., & Galvin, S. (2019). Acculturation and patriarchal beliefs among Asian American young adults: A preliminary investigation. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 122-130. https://doi.10.1037/aap000013

Yoon, E., Chang, H., & Adams, K. (2018). Interrelations of patriarchal beliefs, gender, collectivism/individualism, and mental health. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 199-217. https://doi.10.1080/09515070.2018.1511520

Publicado

2026-07-04

Como Citar

Magalhães, E., Chim, I., Costa, P., David, B., & Graça, J. (2026). Patriarchal Beliefs Scale: Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version. PSICOLOGIA, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1986

Edição

Secção

Artigos