A meta-synthesis about the study of men’s sexual behavior through the lens of hegemonic masculinity

Authors

  • Rita Grave Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto
  • Teresa Teixeira Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto
  • Pedro M. Teixeira Life and Health Sciences Research Institute ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory
  • António M. Marques Escola de Saúde do Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal
  • Conceição Nogueira Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.v34i2.1661

Keywords:

hegemonic masculinity, men, meta-synthesis, sexual behavior

Abstract

The aim of this study is to understand how men experience sexual behavior in relation to dominant masculine norms in heteronormative social organizations. After a systematic search and a careful study selection process, we analyzed 15 scientific qualitative studies on men's sexual practices that draw on hegemonic masculinity. We then carried out a thematic synthesis of the results that collectively covered 438 male narratives ranging in age from 11 to 71. The results include (hetero)sex as a signifier of manhood, male sexual collectivity; sexual hierarchies; sexual risk; and the invisibility of sexual diversity. This meta-synthesis emphasizes the complex relationship between male sexuality and the influence of hegemonic masculinity, revealing important health and well-being effects on men. Also, this highlights a dynamic relationship that affects not only men but also their partners in sexual relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amâncio, L. (2004). A(s) masculinidade(s) em que-estão. In L. Amâncio (Ed.), Aprender a ser homem: Construindo masculinidades (pp. 13–27). Livros Horizonte.

Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (2002). Sexo en Público. In R. M. M. Jiménez (Ed.), Sexualidades transgresoras: Una antología de estudios queer (pp. 229–257). Icaria Editorial.

*Bishop, S., & Limmer, M. (2017). Performance, power, and condom use: Reconceptualised masculinities amongst Western male sex tourists to Thailand. Culture Health & Sexuality, 20(3), 276–288. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1340671

Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (ed. rev.). Routledge.

Caridade, S., & Machado, C. (2013). Violência nas relações juvenis de intimidade: Uma revisão da teoria, da investigação e da prática. PSICOLOGIA, 27(1), 91-113. http://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v27i1.244

Carneiro, N. S. (2009). “Homossexualidades” uma psicologia entre ser pertencer e participar. Livpsic.

Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Standford California Press.

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Polity Press.

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity—Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. http://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1980(1), 139–167.

Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53. http://doi.org/10.1177/135581960501000110

*Doull, M., Oliffe, J., Knight, R., & Shoveller, J. A. (2013). Sex and straight young men: Challenging and endorsing hegemonic masculinities and gender regimes. Men and Masculinities, 16(3), 329–346. http://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X13494837

*Duckworth, K. D., & Trautner, M. N. (2019). Gender goals: Defining Masculinity and Navigating Peer Pressure to Engage in Sexual Activity. Gender & Society, 33(5), 795–817. http://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219863031

*Eck, B. A. (2014). Compromising positions: Unmarried men, heterosexuality, and two-phase masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 17(2), 147–172. http://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14533642

Edwards, J., & Kaimal, G. (2016). Using meta-synthesis to support application of qualitative methods findings in practice: A discussion of meta-ethnography, narrative synthesis, and critical interpretive synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 51, 30–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2016.07.003

Fausto-Sterling, A. (1997). How to build a man. In R. N. Lancaster & M. di Leonardo (Eds.), The gender sexuality reader: Culture, history, political economy (pp. 244–248). Routledge.

*Fileborn, B., Hinchliff, S., Lyons, A., Heywood, W., Minichiello, V., Brown, G., … Crameri, P. (2017). The Importance of sex and the meaning of sex and sexual pleasure for men aged 60 and older who engage in heterosexual relationships: Findings from a qualitative interview study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(7), 2097–2110. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0918-9

*Fleming, C., & Davis, S. (2018). Masculinity and virgin-shaming among college men. Journal of Men's Studies, 26(3), 227–246. http://doi.org/10.1177/1060826518758974

Foucault, M. (1994). História da sexualidade I: A vontade de saber (P. Tamen, Trad.). Relógio D’Água Editores. (Trabalho Original publicado em 1976)

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education, 22(2) 213–228. http://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189

*Javaid, A. (2017). Masculinities, sexualities and identities: Understanding HIV positive and HIV negative male rape victims. International Sociology, 32(3), 323–342. http://doi.org/10.1177/0268580917696387

Johnston, M. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.

*Kalish, R. (2015). "I'm not gonna not have sex": The male peer group and men's sexual decision-making. Proceedings of the American Sociological Association, 1–19. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sxi&AN=111785606&lang=pt-pt&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Kimmel, M. (2006). Manhood in America: A cultural history. Oxford University Press.

*Kong, T. S. K. (2009). More than a sex machine: Accomplishing masculinity among Chinese male sex workers in the Hong Kong sex industry. Deviant Behavior, 30(8), 715–745. http://doi. org/10.1080/01639620902854654

*Lamb, S., Kosterina, E. V., Roberts, T., Brodt, M., Maroney, M., & Dangler, L. (2017). Voices of the mind: Hegemonic masculinity and others in mind during young men's sexual encounters. Men and Masculinities, 21(2), 254–275. http://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17695038

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 1-28. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

*Limmer, M. (2016). “I don’t shag dirty girls”: Marginalized masculinities and the use of partner selection as a sexual health risk reduction strategy in heterosexual young men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 10(2), 128–140. http://doi.org/10.1177/1557988314559241

Marques, A. M. (2004). Os trabalhos da masculinidade. Culturas ocupacionais sob hegemonia masculina. In L. Amâncio (Ed.), Aprender a ser homem: Construindo masculinidades (pp. 29–50). Livros Horizonte.

Marques, A. M. (2011). Masculinidades e profissões: Discursos e resistências. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian e Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.Messerschmidt, J. W., & Messner, M. (2018). Hegemonic, nonhegemonic, and “new” masculinities. In James W. Messerschmidt, P. Y. Martin, M. Messner, & R. Connell (Eds.), Gender reckonings: New social theory and research (pp. 35–56). New York University Press.

Moskowitz, D. A., Rieger, G., & Roloff, M. E. (2008). Tops, bottoms and versatiles. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23(3), 191–202. http://doi.org/10.1080/14681990802027259

*Moolman, B. (2015). Carceral dis/continuities: Masculinities, male same-sex desire, discipline, and rape in South African prisons. Gender & Behaviour, 13(2), 6742–6752.

Plummer, K. (2005). Male sexualities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 178–195). Sage Publications.

*Prohaska, A., & Gailey, J. A. (2010). Achieving masculinity through sexual predation: The case of hogging. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 13–25. http://doi.org/10.1080/09589230903525411

*Ravenhill, J. P., & de Visser, R. O. (2017). “It takes a man to put me on the bottom”: Gay men’s experiences of masculinity and anal intercourse. Journal of Sex Research, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1403547

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(2), 153–170. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10072

Santos, L. (2019). Homens, masculinidades e violência simbólica. In S. Caridade, A. I. Sani, L. M. Nunes, R. Estrada, & F. Viana (Eds.), Abordagens contemporâneas de vitimação, violência e crime (pp. 121-139). Coisas de Ler Edições Lda.

*Stern, E., Cooper, D., & Greenbaum, B. (2015). The relationship between hegemonic norms of masculinity and men's conceptualization of sexually coercive acts by women in South Africa. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(5), 796–817. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514536275

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1342–1365. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269888

Tiefer, L. (2004). Sex is not a natural act and other essays (2nd ed.). Westview Press.

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x

Weeks, J. (1986). Sexuality (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.

Whitehead, S. M. (2001). Man: The invisible gendered subject? In Stephen M. Whitehead & F. J. Barrett (Eds.), The masculinities reader (pp. 351–368). Polity Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Grave, R., Teixeira, T., M. Teixeira, P., M. Marques, A., & Nogueira, C. (2020). A meta-synthesis about the study of men’s sexual behavior through the lens of hegemonic masculinity. PSICOLOGIA, 34(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.v34i2.1661

Issue

Section

Non-thematic articles