Judgment of Covariation: A Review

Authors

  • André Mata William James Center for Research, ISPA University Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v30i1.1082

Abstract

This paper reviews a selection of influential studies on judgment of covariation in order to examine how accurate are people’s covariation judgments in general, and how sophisticated are the strategies they use to make those judgments. Very different answers have been given to these questions, depending on several factors, including the method that is used to assess people’s performance on these tasks, and the motivation that people to have to reach certain conclusions. It is argued that, although people are often quite poor at judging covariation, they are flexible in the strategies that they use to do so, and they have the potential to use sophisticated strategies and make accurate judgments when certain conditions are met.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-06-25

How to Cite

Mata, A. (2016). Judgment of Covariation: A Review. PSICOLOGIA, 30(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v30i1.1082

Issue

Section

Non-thematic articles