Dark Future Scale adaptation and factor structure in Uruguay

Autores

  • Victor Ortuño Universidad de la República, Uruguay Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9523-0874
  • Ismael Apud Universidad de la República
  • Richard Rodríguez Universidad de la República
  • Joaquín Díaz Universidad de la República

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.2042

Palavras-chave:

future anxiety, subjective temporality, psychological assessment, psychometrics, factor analysis

Resumo

Future Anxiety refers to a state of apprehension, insecurity, fear and worries about possible and unfavourable changes in the personal future, is measured with the Dark Future Scale. This study explores its factor structure and psychometric characteristics with 1850 participants, with ages between 13 and 82 years old (M = 28.99, SD = 10.91). Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, a one-dimension structure was found, explaining 64% of total variance, high factor loadings and reliability (λ ≥ .60, α = .86, ω = .86). Evidence of convergent-divergent validity was found: responsibility (r = -.28), emotional stability (r = -.32), openness to new experiences (r = -.23), satisfaction with life (r = -.38), past negative (r = .56) and future negative (r = .40). Measurement invariance across sex was supported, allowing for meaningful group comparisons. In general, results support a clear factor structure with adequate reliability and validity within general population.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Almeida, T. (2016). Identidade vocacional e a sua relação com a perspetiva temporal: um estudo com jovens adultos portugueses a frequentar a universidade (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Alvarez-Nuñez, L. (2018). Confiabilidad y validez de la escala consideración de las consecuencias futuras en español. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Apud, I., Ortuño, V., Azambuya, M. N., Pérez, E., Reimondo, M.R., González, V., Paolillo, S., & Pedraja, N. V. (2022). Budismo y Personalidad. Estudio mixto cualitativo-cuantitativo en la Soka Gakkai Internacional del Uruguay. Persona, 25(2), 39-64. https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2022.n25(2).6140

Apud, I., Ortuño, V., Vallverdú, J., Millet, D., Barreto, D., Mota, G., Aquino, F., & Gulisano, M. (2024). The Vajrayāna personality. A mixed quantitative-qualitative study on Tibetan Buddhism in Spain. Studies in Psychology, 45(2-3), 338-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/02109395241290790

Apud, I., Ortuño, V., Vallverdú, J., Millet, D., Nuñez, B., Roth Kelland, M., Maciel Suárez, T., & Vega, J. (2025). La Personalidad Zen: Estudio mixto cuantitativo-cualitativo en practicantes budistas de Cataluña. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 18(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.18106

Borkovec, T. D., Robinson, E., Pruzinsky, T., & DePree, J. A. (1983). Preliminary exploration of worry: Some characteristics and processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21(1), 9–16.

Diaz, J. (2019). La oscuridad humana detrás de Instagram (Unpublished graduate thesis). Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

Dodd, R. H., Dadaczynski, K., Okan, O., McCaffery, K. J., & Pickles, K. (2021). Psychological wellbeing and academic experience of university students in Australia during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030866

Duplaga, M. & Grysztar, M. (2021). The Association between Future Anxiety, Health Literacy and the Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare, 9(43). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010043

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Hammad, M. A. (2016). Future Anxiety and Its Relationship to Students' Attitude toward Academic Specialization. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 54-65.

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., & Donohew, R. L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and individual differences, 32(3), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00032-0

Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395–400.

Janeiro, I. N. (2012). O Inventário de Perspectiva Temporal: estudo de validação. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 2(34), 117-132.

Jannini, T. B., Rossi, R., Socci, V., & Di Lorenzo, G. (2022). Validation of the Dark Future Scale (DFS) for future anxiety on an Italian sample. Journal of Psychopathology, 28(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.36148/2284-0249-45

Kaya, S., & Avci, R. (2016). Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral-Theory-Based Skill-Training on University Students' Future Anxiety and Trait Anxiety. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 66, 281-298. https://doi.org/14689/ejer.2016.66.16

Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications.

Košťál, J., Klicperová-Baker, M., Lukavská, K., & Lukavský, J. (2016). Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI–short) with and without the Future-Negative scale, verified on nationally representative samples. Time & Society, 25(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577254

Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P., & Dugas, M. J. (2000). Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: A study of a theoretical model of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(9), 933–941.

Ledesma, R. D., Ferrando, P. J., & Tosi, J. D. (2019). Uso del Análisis Factorial Exploratorio en RIDEP. Recomendaciones para autores y revisores. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación–e Avaliação Psicológica, 52(3), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP52.3.13

Ledezma, C. L., Rodriguez, M., De Los Rios, F., & De Bortoli, M. A. (2010). Espiritualidad y ansiedad a futuro en una muestra de adolescentes. II Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología XVII Jornadas de Investigación Sexto Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. Facultad de Psicología - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.

Maydeu-Olivares, A., Shi, D., & Rosseel, Y. (2018). Assessing fit in structural equation models: A Monte Carlo evaluation of RMSEA versus SRMR confidence intervals and tests of close fit. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1389611

Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

Nuttin, J., & Lens, W. (1985). Future Time Perspective and Motivation: theory and research method. Belgium: Leuven University Press.

Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522.

Oliveri, A. (2018). Assessment of personality through Five Factor Model: reliability and convergent validity of the BFI-2 and TIPI (Unpublished graduate thesis). Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

Ortuño, V. E. (2020). Aproximaciones a la Temporalidad Subjetiva: La Perspectiva Temporal en foco. En V. E. Ortuño & A. Vásquez (Eds.), Psicología del Tiempo: Una introducción a la temporalidad en las ciencias del comportamiento (pp. 85-138). Montevideo: Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica – CSIC.

Ortuño, V. E., Janeiro, I. N., Paixão, M. P., Esteves, C., & Cordeiro, P. (2017). Um novo modelo multidimensional da Perspetiva Temporal. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 45(3), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP45.3.06

Ortuño, V. E., Paixão, M. P., & Janeiro, I. N. (2017). Qualitative and Quantitative Trends in the Assessment of Subjective Temporality. En A. Kostić & D. Chadee (Eds.), Time Perspective: Theory and Practice (pp. 167-194). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60191-9_8

Ortuño, V. E., & Vásquez, A. E. (2013). Time perspective and self-esteem: Negative temporality affects the way we judge ourselves. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Psychologica, 6, 109-125.

Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1996). Psicología anormal (7ª edición). México: Prentice Hall.

Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D. B., Shorey, H. S., & Rand, K. L. (2002). Hopeful choices: A school counselor´s guide to hope theory. Professional School Counseling, 5(5), 298-307.

Sobol, M., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórka, A. (2020). Time of pandemic: Temporal perspectives related to compliance with public health regulations concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine, 265, 113408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113408

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of personality and social psychology, 113(1), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096

Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Martín, A., Esteves, C., Ortuño, V. E., & Joireman, J. (2017). Adaptación y Validación Inicial al Castellano de la Escala de Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 44(2), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP44.2.01

Widenfelt, B. M., Treffers, P. D., de Beurs, E., Siebelink, B. M., & Koudijs, E. (2005). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-4752-1

Yıldırım, M., Kaynar, Ö., Arslan, G., & Chirico, F. (2023). Fear of COVID-19, resilience, and future anxiety: psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the dark future scale. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(4), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040597

Zaleski, Z. (1994). Psychology of future orientation. Lublin, Poland: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.

Zaleski, Z. (1996). Future anxiety: Concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and individual differences, 21(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00070-0

Zaleski, Z., & Janson, M. (2000). Effect of future anxiety and locus of control on power strategies used by military and civilian supervisors. Studia Psychologica, 42(1/2), 87-96.

Zaleski, Z., Sobol-Kwapinska, M., Przepiorka, A., & Meisner, M. (2019). Development and validation of the Dark Future scale. Time & Society, 28(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X16678257

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Publicado

2026-07-04

Como Citar

Ortuño, V., Apud, I., Rodríguez, R., & Díaz, J. (2026). Dark Future Scale adaptation and factor structure in Uruguay. PSICOLOGIA, 40(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.2042

Edição

Secção

Artigos